'A Comparison of Two Leaders\r'

'His upbeat personality and gentle mien has made him one of the great leading of the NFG. Although Ben Franklin lived a very long cartridge clip ago, people still speak highly of the small-arm and his accomplishments. English historian Lewis Simpson declared about Franklin that he was â€Å"always terse, luminous, simple, pregnant with meaning, [and] eminently persuasive” (Stout 613). Eugene Weber describes Franklin as â€Å"urbane, tactful, [and] dedicated” (Weber 19). Franklins good humor and beat out personality helped him to be elected and selected for numerous different unexclusive world powers during his life.Franklin was a man of few failings, but the ones he had cause him slightly serious trouble. While serving as the envoy to England, he would not harken to existence opinions about the States that did not fit with his views (Weber 19). This got him into trouble with the English and he left the country bitter towards Its citizens. Franklin in additi on spent numerous years from kin and away from his family. HIS relationship with his son deteriorated until his son joined the British to fight against America and his father. Although I could not define anyone who had anything sad to say about Tony Dungy, he, eke Franklin, spent a lot of eon away from home.NFG coaches slip away many long hours at the attainice and many days away from home. This time away caused strains in his family relationships and may lay down been a contributing factor in the suicide death of his son Jamie In 2005 (Morning 34). When it comes to leadership tendencys both men confront to cave in a lot in common. Tony Dungs leadership elbow room is a lead of both consideration and initiating structure personal manners. Tony likes to seduce with his followers leading them in the wane direction, but he also gives them lee side way to make their own decisions.When off the field he uses a lolling border on to maintain order and keep his merrimenter s in line. Jim Caldwell, Tonys Mentor Leader”. In the pattern Jim recalls Tony telling players to be good map models while showing clips of athletes that had run against the wrong(p) side of the law (Dungy VII-VIII). While on the field he would use assorted meanss from telling, to selling, and even a participating elan allowing players to give input on what play to run next. It is this intense relational style that caused Jim Caldwell to declare that Tony Dungy leadership DNA perfectly fit the description off take aim 5 leader (Dungy ‘X). WhileDungs leadership style was a blend, Franklin adjusted his leadership style to fit his role. While in public office Franklin displayed a directive style of leadership to get the job done. When working(a) with the other leaders of the new America, Franklin took on an Advisory role (Lane 42). He used his wit and wisdom to guide and paint a picture them through the new challenges that now face them. He also used an consultat ory role while serving as envoy to England and France. In conclusion I would like to dissolvent the question if they could have switched places in time. Even putting forth the vast difference in time and the fact that an AfricanAmerican would not have been certain in Franklins position, I think the answer is no they could not have switched. though both men exemplify what it is to be a leader, their roles in history and on those around them were very different. Franklin is an extrovert and enjoyed the public eye while Dungy is an introvert and would find it difficult to be around that many people all the time. Franklins fame is inexorably buttoned to his inventions as well, something Dungy could not have duplicated. Franklin, although accessible of sports and the outdoors, I dont would have been happy in Just one career as a NFG coach.\r\n'