Immanuel Kants Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals Essays

Immanuel Kants Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals In his publication, Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals, Immanuel Kant supplies his readers with a thesis that claims morality can be derived from the principle of the categorical imperative. The strongest argument to support his thesis is the deflection between actions in accordance with duty and actions in accordance from duty. To setup his thesis, Kant first draws a distinction between empirical and a priori concepts. Empirical concepts ar ideas we reach from our experiences in the world. On the other hand and in contrast, a priori concepts be ideas we reach as an end point of reasoning prior to or apart from any experience of how things occur in the world. Kant then claims that moral actions are supposed done for the reason of morality alone. This train of thought leads to the rebrinyder that an understanding of morality must be based on a priori concepts of reason. Truly moral ideas are then universally valid if an d only if they are based on a priori concepts.From this idea of a priori concepts, Kant begins his thesis with the notion that the only thing in the world that is a qualified unspoilt is the commodity will, even if its efforts bring about a not necessarily good result. A good will is good because of the willing that is involved. Two main implications arise with this idea of the good will. The first implication is moral actions cannot have impure motivations. There are many impure motivations but Kant tends to focal point mainly on the motives of the pursuit of happiness and self-preservation. Second, moral actions cannot be based on the speculations of the probable results. This action is not good in itself but good because it brought about a more desirable outcome. Thus, Kant arrives at the conclusion that for an action to be considered to have genuine moral worth its motive must be that of dutifulness to moral law.In Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals, Kant lays out three propositions about duty. The first is the will is a morally good action if it is done in accordance from duty, as opposed to an action done in accordance with duty. The second proposition is that actions are judged by the maxim or principle that was the motivation behind the action. If mortal undertakes an action with the only motivation being that of a sense of duty, they are followin... ...viously that you will be more probable to engage and look to engage in more actions that will give you this appeal and instant gratification. This is not an ideal situation because placing a slight neglect to a duty or responsibleness that you might not find appeal in defeats the purpose of completing all of the obligations set for us to go through with.Kants thesis has loudness in the fact that the universal law seems closely related to the golden rule, which is do on to others as you would have others do on to you. With a asseveration as such it is awfully arduous to not perform a moral action. The weakness still lies in the fact Kant takes little to no regard to humans natural emotions and feelings. Leading a moral life does not have to be a melancholy life, one in which you are hold in to an endless amount of duties that you can seek no joy in. Whether or not Kant intended to make morality seem like torture, it appears it comes off in this manner. Kants overall view of morality appears near flawless. If there was a manner in which he could have incorporated a leeway for rough emotions, I feel his thesis is in actuality how each individual should lead his or her life.